Government Accountability Project

Protecting Corporate, Government & International Whistleblowers since 1977

Report Shows Exactly Why Federal Whistleblowers Need Protection

E-mail Print PDF

Today, GAP released a report on one of the most effective ways to undermine the disclosures of a whistleblower: retaliatory investigations. Whistleblower Witch Hunts follows 12 federal employees into Kafka’s The Trial, as they undergo underhanded tactics that run the gamut of indecency, including:

  • Denying the existence of active but secret investigations;
  • Classifying or restricting information years after the fact, and then imposing ex post facto liability for blowing the whistle with it;
  • Making unsupported accusations of whistleblowers being suicidal, violent or otherwise mentally disturbed, without providing any medical basis;
  • Raiding whistleblowers’ homes and scaring their families, confiscating personal property
  • Enacting blacklisting campaigns for several years

It’s no wonder that retaliatory investigations are used to silence whistleblowers: Framing the messenger kills the message. Unfortunately, this approach ultimately harms the public, the messenger and the agency while whistleblowers’ warnings remain unheeded.

The whistleblowers profiled in this new report exposed national security risks including: the attempted cancellation of all Air Marshal coverage during a confirmed terrorist plan for a more ambitious rerun of 9/11, fraudulent certifications for mechanics who vouch for commercial aircraft safety, and the failure by the Air Force to conduct required inspections and maintenance for over a decade on intelligence and cargo aircraft, which could lead to mechanical failures that endanger servicemen’s lives, delay critical missions, and cause national security breaches.

But it doesn’t stop there. Public safety disclosures detailed in the report include the stonewalling of lifesaving military equipment for U.S. troops and civilians abroad, corrupt diversion of all funds reserved to treat dramatic brain injury for over 400,000 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, and losing track of a significant amount worth of plutonium. Plus, civil liberties abuses spanned the NSA's warrantless domestic surveillance, and the Justice Department’s lying to court about a dress rehearsal for Abu Ghraib tactics on American citizen John Walker Lindh.

Legislation currently pending in Congress, the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act, empowers whistleblowers to stop retaliation in its initial stage, rather than have to live indefinitely with investigations or dossiers that are used as smoke screens to cloud genuine threats. Click here to sign a petition to demand the Act be passed!

Shanna Devine is Legislative Coordinator for the Government Accountability Project, the nation's leading whistleblower advocacy organization.

 

1 Comment

  1. I wish your organization would undertake looking at how often this tactic is used by the govt.--especially certain agencies, such as EPA--lest people think this is a rare tactic only used against these 12 individuals. Having had a bogus criminal invetigation for the "aapearance" of favoratism to a contractor hanging over my head for three-and-a-half years AFTER the IG investigation cleared me, and came to the correct conclusion that I had saved taxpayers miilions of dollars, and done what was right and I was supposed to do, I can attest to how common a tactic this is. Then, to have had the former crooked Dept. of Labor Administrative Review Board make up an excuse for the agency that it didn't advance, and wasn't in the record, in order to "justify" that the agency's actions weren't retaliation for whistleblowing--as an Administrative Law Judge had twice found while calling EPA's actions "reprehensible"--merely added insult to injury, and showed how crooked and one-sided the system is in favor of powerful govt. or corporate interests. Until taxpayers demand the protection for whistleblowers that is needed to protect them when they come forward, those taxpayers have no one to blame but themselves for wasteful agencies that only protect powerful corporate interests to the detriment of taxpayer health and safety, (or incompetent, wasteful or greedy bureaucrats)because both the govt. employees in the agencies and the employees in the industries that destroy the environment, or fail to protect their food or drugs, or waste tax money know that it would do no good to come forward and merely destroy their lives for naught. I would certainly think twice about doing what was right and saving millions of taxpayer dollars as well as protecting their environment next time, given the years of hell and the destruction of my once-promising career I have had to suffer for nothing.

      • >:o
      • :-[
      • :'(
      • :-(
      • :-D
      • :-*
      • :-)
      • :P
      • :\
      • 8-)
      • ;-)

    •