Government Accountability Project

Protecting Corporate, Government & International Whistleblowers since 1977

Intelligence

Senators: Justice Department Misleading Public About Spy Powers

Despite the Obama administration's proclaimed commitment to transparency, the administration's approach to national security policy continues to send mix signals.  

According to two members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, under Obama, we have a secret court (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court) issuing a secret interpretation of a law (Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act) that gives the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) the power to collect information on individuals in secret.  

Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act, known as the "business records" provision, allows law enforcement to obtain "any tangible thing" that is relevant to an international terrorism or espionage investigation. Section 215 allows collection of information on individuals who are not target of a criminal investigation or even suspected of criminal activity. And, Section 215 orders come with a gag order prohibiting the recipient – which could be your library, your bank, your credit card company, or any other private entity – from disclosing receipt of the order.

However, this is just what we know from reading the statute.  Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Mark Udall (D-CO) commendably sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder sharply criticizing the Justice Department's use of a secret interpretation of surveillance powers, and accusing the Justice Department of misleading the public:

. . . we have been concerned for some time that the U.S. government is relying on secret interpretations of surveillance authorities that - in our judgment - differ significantly from the public's understanding of what is permitted under U.S. law. . . . Justice Department officials have - on a number of occasions - made what we believe are misleading statements pertaining the government's interpretation of surveillance law.
Read more »  
 

Blogger to N.Y. Times: Leibowitz is a Whistleblower and a Patriot

At the time federal judge Alexander Williams Jr. of the U.S. District Court of Maryland sentenced former FBI translator Shamai Leibowitz for disclosing supposedly classified information to a blogger, even Judge Williams did not know the nature of the information Leibowitz disclosed. The New York Times reports that Judge Williams said at sentencing:

All I know is that it’s a serious case. . . I don’t know what was divulged other than some documents, and how it compromised things, I have no idea.

Nonetheless, the Justice Department deemed the information secret enough to warrant prosecuting Leibowitz under the Espionage Act. Leibowitz was a target of the Justice Department's war on whistleblowers, and he pleaded guilty to disclosing classified information to a blogger. In a recent interview with the New York Times, the blogger – identified only anonymously in court papers, but now revealed to be Richard Silverstein – claims Leibowitz:

. . . passed on secret transcripts of conversations caught on F.B.I. wiretaps of the Israeli Embassy in Washington. Those overheard by the eavesdroppers included American supporters of Israel and at least one member of Congress . . .
Read more »  
 

NSA Whistleblower Thomas Drake's First Op-Ed in WaPo: We Need to Listen to Him

National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Thomas Drake has been mentioned by name in editorials in all the major newspapers – the Washington Post (here and here), L.A. Times (here), and New York Times yesterday, which is worth quoting:

Treating potentially embarrassing information as a state secret is the antithesis of healthy government.

Today, WaPo publishes Drake's first solo op-ed since he was sentenced to community service and probation after the Justice Department's Espionage Act case against him imploded days before trial. Drake and I did a joint op-ed in the Philadelphia Inquirer a few weeks ago, but now, after being silenced for the better part of a decade, Drake speaks on his own, in his own powerful words:

The government’s penchant since Sept. 11, 2001, for operating in secrecy and hiding behind an executive branch “state secrets” doctrine has damaged our long-term national security and national character. It has, by sacrificing Americans’ general welfare and civil liberties, given rise to a persistent military-industrial-intelligence ­con­gressional surveillance complex.

Do not let Drake become a footnote in history. We have gone too far down the path of becoming a secrecy surveillance society, but it is not too late. Drake's case should be a turning point and his op-ed a rallying cry that our government can no longer hide its malfeasance behind the national security hysteria that has corrupted its institutions since 9/11.

Read more »  
 

My 7-Year-Old Knows What a Secret Is, But the U.S. Government Does Not

An editorial in today's New York Times criticizes the Obama administration's use of the Espionage Act to go after whistleblowers and the government's use of secrecy to hide embarrassing, inappropriate or illegal government conduct.  

The editorial focuses on a formal complaint filed with the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) by the former head of that office under the G.W. Bush administration, J. William Leonard:

A former top official in charge of ensuring that real secrets are kept secret has delivered a stunning repudiation of the Obama administration’s decision to use the Espionage Act against a whistle-blower attempting to expose government waste and abuse.  

The Times hits the nail on the head, deftly explaining the larger significance of the Espionage Act prosecutions and underlying pervasive government secrecy:

Two years ago, President Obama ordered all agencies to review secret material by June 2012 with a goal of promoting more declassification. Unfortunately, the administration’s emphasis since then has all been in the opposite direction. Treating potentially embarrassing information as a state secret is the antithesis of healthy government.
Read more »  
 

Drake's First TV Appearance Since Sentencing: "Yes, I Would Do It Again."

National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Thomas Drake appeared with me on Russian Television's The Alyona Show yesterday, his first TV appearance since the Espionage Act case against him completely imploded days before trial and the Judge slammed the Justice Department at sentencing.


Read more »  
 
Page 10 of 19